The Ludologist

Nintendo’s announced the new name for the console what used to be called Revolution: Wii.

More at the Wii website, still called revolution.

Lots of advertising-speak, “Wii has a distinctive “ii” spelling that symbolizes both the unique controllers and the image of people gathering to play.

Glad that’s out of the way. Silly name, but then I have graphics card called GeForce, probably symbolizing something with speed.

Aki Järvinen was one of the first video game researchers I ever met, and now he is finishing his Ph.d. thesis with a new big theory of video games on his Games Without Frontiers site.
He invites us to read his chapters as they progress and to send comments.
Chapters so far:

• Chapter 3, Introduction to Game Systems, Game Elements, and Simulation.
• Chapter 4, Theory of Game Elements: From Game Systems to Their Contexts.
• Chapter 5, Key concepts in Psychology in Terms of Ludology.

An excellent way of making sure the thesis hits the market with no usability issues, while improving playability!

With digital distribution actually happening, including Steam and Greg Costikyan’s Manifesto Games, as well as the casual games downloadable market, one of the imagined futures of the games industry seems to have become quite real.
Another thing that has been discussed incessantly is episodic content, so behold the trailer for Half-Life 2, episode one – each episode apparently priced at $19.95, which I find reasonable enough.
On a tangent, I think it was Gabe Newell who at the GDC talked about how much better the quality of life as a developer was making episodic content. (Couldn’t it be due to do with other factors than the episodicness itself?)

You may have noticed three new blogs linked in the right panel:

• Phil Steinmeyer’s blog is about casual games, and plays a role in his development work, such as with the creation of Bonnie’s bookstore and some prototypes he recently asked his readers to rate.
• Storytron News is Chris Crawford’s blog chronicling the development of Storytron.
• Finally, Click Nothing is Clint Hocking’s (of Splinter Cell fame) blog.

All three are developer blogs – suddenly, developer blogs all over. What happened to secrecy?

To say a bit more about the 400 project: For years, this has been an idea stated on a web site plus a few rules in Game Developer Magazine, but with the March 16th update, the 400 project has turned into a valuable resource with the current rules master list.

112 so far, not 400 (which according to Noah Falstein is a random number anyway).

I think it is not as much a list of 112 things that you have to apply to every game in the world (give or take a few conditions for which rules trump which), as it is a list that can inspire any given game design. A few examples:

3	Maintain Level of Abstraction	Immersion is easily disturbed — don’t make the player re-calibrate his “suspension of disbelief” and lose touch with your game	Psych	Hal Barwood
108	Provide Score Feedback	In a game where score is important, provide direct audio and visual feedback every time the score changes – like a sound and floating numbers.	Feedback	Steve Meretzky

Of course, you knew perfectly well to maintain the level of abstraction and to provide score feedback. But did you really do this in your current game? I think the list is for that type of realization.

Time passes.

Here are my selected notes from Game Developers Conference 2006:

• It was good to see Chris Crawford actually attending GDC sessions. He has also solved the problem of interactive storytelling: You see, the problem is language, and language is really hard. People have traditionally tried to work on interactive storytelling by first building a world model, and then building a language. But, since according to the Sapir-Whorf thesis, we perceive everything through language, the problem can be solved by building the world and the language at the same time. That’s it.
• My own talk was a balance act in that I tried to provide interesting “think outside the box” observations for the serious game people, while acknowledging the very strong constraints that they work under, saying something concretely useful, while not stepping on the toes of the (unserious) game devs in the room… I think the balance was largely successful, and the whole serious game summit was a really interesting place to be.
• Noah Falstein’s Serious Game Summit presentation was a great talk on how to build great games. The 400 project has now been updated with The 400 Project Rule List, an excellent resource for game design.
• Casual games had their share of the buzz this year, already a cutthroat business, but spirits seemed high at the Minna Mingle. The Xbox Live Arcade came out as a really interesting platform with a 22% conversion rate (way higher than the more usual 0.5-2%) out of 30 million downloads. But if you do the math, this translates into 600,000 downloads at $15 max, which is a total income of $9 million. Which can only support a very small number of companies as it is.
• Cloud is wonderful, but I may not be playing it long.
• But the really recurrent topic was prototyping. Chaim Gingold and Chris Hecker (both at Maxis) made an excellent “advanced prototyping” lecture.
  Here are some characteristics of good prototypes: Testable, falsifiable (must make a claim), quick to make, relevant, surprising (feedback, upside, downside, inspiring), persuasive (a tool for at changing people’s mind at your team), prototypes ask questions. The hard thing is then decomposition: What part of your game can you prototype and how? Prototyping code must be agile and fast, but not robust, elegant, or optimal. Use toolkits, not frameworks (frameworks want to own the project).
• Kleenex testing (term for using new players who haven’t seen the game before and are then discarded).
• Astrobiology is really interesting, and I also enjoy the Russian space program, but not much info was given for the Spore-hungry audience.
• Also an interesting session about prototyping Civilization 4.
• Eric Todd from Maxis also discussed prototyping, focusing much on the decomposition problem and breaking game design into 4 areas named Game mechanics / kinesthetics (how you feel where your body is) / aesthetics / technology.
  While your prototype only specific aspects of your game, polish matters. “It is worth the time to use the 10% extra time and make your prototype cool and obvious”.
  Tips: Enable tight iteration. Don’t try to create the real game in preproduction. Don’t prototype for every discussion, but when you get stuck in discussion. Design documents get written during move to production.
• And back to Chris Crawford: According to the leaflet for his new Storytron system,
  “Chris Crawford is considered by some to be the finest interactive designer alive“.
  But really, there are very few dead interactive designers, so a more precise description would be,
  “The finest interactive designer since the universe was created 14 billion years ago.”
  I would suggest infusing a dash of modesty and keeping it to,
  “Chris Crawford is considered by some to be the finest interactive designer since the Pleistocene”.

GDC as keywords: Prototyping, games without goals, offbeat games, digital distribution, casual games.

Another example of a genre & convention analysis masquerading as a tool / guide, please welcome The Kasual Kit.

Yes, it is a joke, apparently from Chuzzle author John Raptis.

Here is the Gamasutra summary of my keynote at the Serious Games Summit at GDC today.

Another summary at Gamespot.

Regarding writing, I will put up the article version of the talk soon.