The Ethics of Computer Games

My former colleague Miguel Sicart has just published his book The Ethics of Computer Games on MIT Press.

0262012650-medium

Description

Despite the emergence of computer games as a dominant cultural industry (and the accompanying emergence of computer games as the subject of scholarly research), we know little or nothing about the ethics of computer games. Considerations of the morality of computer games seldom go beyond intermittent portrayals of them in the mass media as training devices for teenage serial killers. In this first scholarly exploration of the subject, Miguel Sicart addresses broader issues about the ethics of games, the ethics of playing the games, and the ethical responsibilities of game designers. He argues that computer games are ethical objects, that computer game players are ethical agents, and that the ethics of computer games should be seen as a complex network of responsibilities and moral duties. Players should not be considered passive amoral creatures; they reflect, relate, and create with ethical minds. The games they play are ethical systems, with rules that create gameworlds with values at play.

Drawing on concepts from philosophy and game studies, Sicart proposes a framework for analyzing the ethics of computer games as both designed objects and player experiences. After presenting his core theoretical arguments and offering a general theory for understanding computer game ethics, Sicart offers case studies examining single-player games (using Bioshock as an example), multiplayer games (illustrated by Defcon), and online gameworlds (illustrated by World of Warcraft) from an ethical perspective. He explores issues raised by unethical content in computer games and its possible effect on players and offers a synthesis of design theory and ethics that could be used as both analytical tool and inspiration in the creation of ethical gameplay.

About the Author

Miguel Sicart is Assistant Professor at the Center for Computer Game Research, IT University Copenhagen

New Issue of Game Studies: EverQuest Revisited

Get your video game theory fix: New issue of Game studies, issue 0901 on “EverQuest – 10 Years Later“.

*

Special Issue – EQ: 10 Years Later

by Eric Hayot, Edward Wesp

Reviews the place of EverQuest in the history of virtual world studies; lays out some of the critical issues that emerge from the study of MMORPGs; and introduces the essays in this issue….
*

by Nick Yee

This paper explores how the social architectures in virtual worlds can lead to behavioral changes at the community level by shaping norms and expectations…
*

by Greg Lastowka

This article describes EverQuest as a fictive text, a computer game, and an online community and explains how these three distinct frameworks lead to different legal regulatory modalities. It concludes that the optimal legal regulation for virtual worlds like Norrath is a question that must be addressed by the political process…
*

by Sal Humphreys

Explores issues of ownership, governance, labour, rights and obligations in MMOGs, using research conducted in EQ. The clash between product and service, between proprietary space and public space and between amateur and professional raise questions for policy makers and lawyers considering the rights and obligations of different stakeholders…

*

by Lisbeth Klastrup

This articles discusses online gameworlds as a new form of engaging fictional universes, and how to analytically approach and describe the player’s experience of “worldness” with EverQuest as an illustrative example. It argues that such an analysis should incorporate the study of design, aesthetics, means of expression and sociality…

*

by Bart Simon, Kelly Boudreau, Mark Silverman

This article experiments with a biographical method for exploring memories and play experiences of EverQuest in the lives of two player/researchers. We posit a notion of ‘played sociality’ modeled on biographical understandings of lifecourse and attempt to show how different forms of commitment to the game reverberate through the lives of players…

*

by Eric Hayot, Edward Wesp

This article addresses the interaction of players and designers in the creation of Norrathian geography. In the context of contemporary geographic theory, the authors examine the ways in which EverQuest players have worked both with and against the game’s delineation of meaningful places within the virtual world, arguing that the game’s virtual geography is best understood in the context of the real world geographies within which it is situated…

*

by Eric Hayot

Chris Lena worked as a Producer of EverQuest at Sony Online Entertainment where he was involved in the creation of the 6 most recent expansions. He has been Assistant Producer and Designer on EverQuest Online Adventures as well as a coordinator of game localization efforts for the company. He worked on EQ 2003-2006…
*

by Eric Hayot, Edward Wesp

Brad McQuaid worked as co-designer of EverQuest and development manager from the project’s inception until its launch. Kevin McPherson was one of the first EverQuest team members who primarily worked on the EverQuest client and writing the original background and setting for the Ruins of Kunark expansion…

If You’re not Indie …

Not sure why, but I have been posting only audio and video the last week or so.

Anyway, this year’s Game Developers Conference had a still growing contingent of independent game developers to the extent that it was becoming something of a scene (in a positive sense – see you at the Cellar next year).

But what is Indie anyway? This video from the Independent Games Festival frames that question:

http://www.youtube.com/v/617lGZjYyNo&amp

On the Game Studies Download 4.0 at GDC

I’m a little late to blogging this, but here is the list of the top 10 Game Studies findings, presented at the Game Developers Conference by Ian Bogost, Mia Consalvo and Jane McGonigal.

The audience voted on the papers in order of importance, and my own Fear of Failing came in at #5.

The session slides are here.

****

10. Stewart Woods: “(Play) Ground rules: The social contract and the magic circle”.

9. Jose Zagal and Amy Bruckman: “Novices, gamers, and scholars: Exploring the challenges of teaching about games”.

8. Karen Collins: “Game sound: An introduction to the history, theory, and practice of video game music and sound design”.

7. Charlie Breindahl: “Play to win or win to play? The material culture of gaming”.

6. Gareth Schott: “Relating the pleasures of violent game texts”.

5. Jesper Juul: “Fear of failing: The many meanings of difficulty in video games”.

4. Matt Barton: “How’s the weather: Simulating weather in virtual environments”.

3. Betsy James DiSalvo, Kevin Crowley and Roy Norwood: “Learning in context: Digital games and young black men”.

2. Michael Nitsche: “Video game spaces: Image, play, and structure in 3D worlds”.

1. Susana Tosca & Lisbeth Klastrup: “Because it just looks cool!’ Fashion as character performance—the case of WoW”.