My name is Jesper Juul, and I am a Ludologist [researcher of the design, meaning, culture, and politics of games]. This is my blog on game research and other important things.
It’s hard to argue with Blizzard these days, but the announcement of StarCraft II stirs many emotions for me.
One is respect for the game design of the original game (balancing three entirely different races that well!), but the other is that I experienced my own playing as a long plateau: I would admire the game design, but feel that I just wasn’t getting any better at the game. Perhaps, this time.
I have put up a new article, “Swap Adjacent Gems to Make Sets of Three: A History of Matching Tile Games.”
Swap Adjacent Gems is an attempt at writing the history of matching tile games through the last 20 years.
This is a quite detailed article that discusses a large number of small games. It touches on a few things I consider underexplored:
Swap Adjacent Gems is slated to appear in the Artifact Journal, October 2007.
Acknowledgment: Thanks to everybody who helped me by commenting on my earlier post about matching tile history.
Main Entry: ex-core
Pronunciation: 'eks-'kor
Function: adjective
1: Gamer that is no longer a hardcore gamer.
Coined by Juan Gril on the Casual Games mailing list.
I meet a lot of these. Jobs, kids, etc. making it impossible to be a core gamer anymore.
The XNA framework has been updated to version “1.0 refresh”.
The important change is that it now should be possible to build an Xbox 360 game and send the binary to other users and have them play your game. Previous versions required you to share the source code.
If you were hoping for a blossoming of indie games for the 360, the answer is NO: Games can only be shared with members of the XNA Creator’s Club ($99/year).
Having played briefly with XNA, I can say that it is an amazing step up from building in C++ and DirectX directly – so much clearer, so much faster to use, so much easier to debug, and using a nice managed language, C# (which I enjoy because it is amazingly similar to my favorite language of Java).
*
But we are still stuck with our main problem: The console manufacturers retain complete control of what gets published. Imagine if Philips could decide which audio CDs came out, JVC could decide what DVDs came out, and Penguin could decide what books came out. Only PCs and Macs remain a small haven for free expression in games. THIS IS A HUGE PROBLEM.
This control is partially about money, but still … is it that far-fetched to imagine a future where everybody is allowed to make games for consoles?
I will be happy to give Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo 50% of any money that comes in, just allow us to make the games we want to make. Now.
Center for the Study of the Novel, Stanford, April 20-21:
Workshop: For a Theory of the Novel of the 21st Century
Here, I will be participating in a two-day workshop of a more literary nature:
Please join us for our last event of the CSN 2006-2007 season. This two-day workshop gathers together a younger generation of novel scholars now emerging to national and international prominence to discuss future directions in the field.
More here.
Speaking at a How They Got Game workshop on Tuesday the 17th of April 2007 from 3pm – 4:30pm on the 4th floor of Wallenberg Hall at Stanford University.
In 1977, there were no “hardcore” players of video games: Every video game had to be created with the assumption that players had no understanding of video games, genres, and controllers. Thirty years later, video games are primarily designed for players with extensive knowledge of video game conventions. This is how video games gained a specialized audience, but lost the general public. In this perspective, video games have long ago become a developed “art”, created for connoisseurs, by connoisseurs with a deep understanding of the medium. Using examples, I will discuss the rise of the hardcore gamer market, and how video games are once again opening up to new players via new platforms like the Wii, and via casual games.
These workshops are open to all interested parties with a strong interest in topics surrounding new media, technology, and design. They offer the chance to hear talks by industry professionals and seasoned academics, but also offer the rare opportunity for one-on-one questions as well as collaborative work.
How They Got Game is a research project at the Stanford Humanities Lab dedicated to the historical investigation of computer games and other related interactive technologies. Its diverse membership possesses varying academic interests ranging from machinima, virtual worlds and interactive storytelling.
I am giving a talk at the IT University in Copenhagen today.
The Sun Always Shines in Casual Games:
Cloning and Innovation in a Brand New Field
Time and Place:
Thursday April 12th, 16:15-17:30. Auditorium 1, ITU. Rued Langgaards Vej 7, 2300 Copenhagen S.
About the talk:
During the past 5 or 6 years, casual games have emerged as an important factor within video games. These are small games, easily learned, and usually distributed over the internet. The corresponding appearance of a new casual game audience demonstrates that video games for a long time have failed to speak to a large part of the population. In this talk, I will discuss how casual games differentiate themselves from other game types, and in perspective, show how “hardcore games” have acquired a set of codes and conventions that requires a level of gaming literacy to navigate.
Consequently, the field of casual games put strong conflicting pressures on game developers: Innovate enough to differentiate, but make the game sufficiently like other games that players find it easy to pick up and play. By illustrating the history of matching tile games, and by discussing games likes Zuma, Bejeweled, and Diner Dash, I will show when and how innovation does happen in casual games, and how developers try to assert their original contribution in a field of clones.
I try to avoid nostalgic waxing about old games, but this Wired list of top 10 Amiga games does melt my heart.
If you ask me, the vast majority of old games are horrifically bad. For example, everybody loves Elite, yet who could be bothered playing Elite today?
But Lemmings, oooh:
