Game Studies 19/02

For your theoretical dissection, Game Studies journal issue 19/02.

Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Games Research is out now (Volume 19, Issue 2).

Editorial
Game Studies: How to play — Ten play-tips for the aspiring game-studies scholar
by Espen Aarseth

Articles
“Gotta Catch ‘Em All” – Can Playing Pokémon Go Influence Mood and Empathy?
by Tracy Packiam Alloway & Rachel Carpenter

Don’t Fear the Reapers, Fear Multiculturalism: Canadian Contexts and Ethnic Elisions in Mass Effect
by David Callahan

The Indiepocalypse: the Political-Economy of Independent Game Development Labor in Contemporary Indie Markets
by Nadav D. Lipkin

The Open, the Closed and the Emergent: Theorizing Emergence for Videogame Studies
by Joan Soler-Adillon

Book Review
Review of Gaming the Iron Curtain
by Jaakko Suominen

The indie explosion that’s been going on for 30 years (give or take)

Polygon has kindly published an excerpt from Handmade Pixels.

This is an excerpt from my history chapter, “A selective History of Independent Games”. My concern here is the prehistory of independent games and the central question: is independent game development new or old?

https://www.polygon.com/2019/11/15/20962788/indie-development-history-handmade-pixels

Real Games: What’s Legitimate and What’s Not in Contemporary Videogames

Real Games coverProud to announce Real Games: What’s Legitimate and What’s Not in Contemporary Videogames by Mia Consalvo and Christopher Paul.

This is the 8th(!) book in the Playful Thinking series.

How we talk about games as real or not-real, and how that shapes what games are made and who is invited to play them.

In videogame criticism, the worst insult might be “That’s not a real game!” For example, “That’s not a real game, it’s on Facebook!” and “That’s not a real game, it’s a walking simulator!” But how do people judge what is a real game and what is not—what features establish a game’s gameness? In this engaging book, Mia Consalvo and Christopher Paul examine the debates about the realness or not-realness of videogames and find that these discussions shape what games get made and who is invited to play them.

Consalvo and Paul look at three main areas often viewed as determining a game’s legitimacy: the game’s pedigree (its developer), the content of the game itself, and the game’s payment structure. They find, among other things, that even developers with a track record are viewed with suspicion if their games are on suspect platforms. They investigate game elements that are potentially troublesome for a game’s gameness, including genres, visual aesthetics, platform, and perceived difficulty. And they explore payment models, particularly free-to-play—held by some to be a marker of illegitimacy. Finally, they examine the debate around such so-called walking simulators as Dear Esther and Gone Home. And finally, they consider what purpose is served by labeling certain games “real.”

Loading journal, 12/20.

For your theoretical processing: Loading journal, 12/20.

“The Father of Survival Horror”: Shinji Mikami, Procedural Rhetoric, and the Collective/Cultural Memory of the Atomic Bombs
Ryan Scheiding

Playing Past and Future: Counterfactual History in Fallout 4
Sam McCready

Taking College Esports Seriously
Nyle Sky Kauweloa, Jenifer Sunrise Winter>

“No one gives you a rulebook to raise a kid”: Adoptive Motherhood in The Walking Dead Video Game Series
Sarah Marie Stang

The Role of Architecture in Constructing Gameworlds. >Examples from Dishonored>
Anthony Zonaga, Marcus Carter

Buying Time: Capitalist Temporalities in Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp
Rainforest Scully-Blaker

The Handmade Pixels interviews

For Handmade Pixels, I did a rather extensive series of interviews with developers and festival organizers.

I was interested in general questions of how they framed their own role and how they saw the history of independent games, as well as in the concrete details of their development or festival-organizing practices.

I am dropping half the interviews now, and will publish the rest during the later months of 2019.

Anna Anthropy

Game designer known for games such as Dys4ia, author of the Rise of the Videogame Zinesters manifesto.

Bennett Foddy

Educator and game developer behind punishing games such as QWOP and Getting over it with Bennett Foddy.

Bernie DeKoven

Pioneer in physical and communal games, including with the New Games movement.

Celia Pearce

Educator, writer and game developer who has worked with games, VR, and multimedia since the late 1980s.

David Kanaga

Composer and game developer of games such as Proteus and Oikospiel.

Jason Rohrer

Independent game developer of games such as Passage and One Hour One Life.

Jonathan Blow

Independent game developer, best known for Braid and The Witness.

Kelly Wallick

Chairperson of the Independent Games Festival since 2015, CEO and founder of Indie MEGABOOTH.

Tale of Tales

Belgium-based artist duo—Auriea Harvey and Michaël Samyn—known for their earlier work with experimental and experiential games such as The Path and The Graveyard.

 

Handmade Pixels: Independent Video Games and the Quest for Authenticity out today

Handmade Pixels coverI am thrilled to announce that my new book, Handmade Pixels: Independent Video Games and the Quest for Authenticity, is out today on MIT Press.

How can a digital, immaterial, and globally distributed video game be authentic?

Video games are often dismissed as mere entertainment products created by faceless corporations. The last twenty years, however, have seen the rise of independent, or “indie,” video games: a wave of small, cheaply developed, experimental, and personal video games that react against mainstream video game development and culture. In Handmade Pixels, I examine the paradoxical ways developers, players, and festivals portray independent games as unique and hand-crafted objects in a globally distributed digital medium.

Page previewBut where did independent games come from? Are they independent, just like cinema and music? I tell the history of independent video games from 1998-2018, and show the ongoing tensions around what indie games should be: Fun games? Games with political impact? Games representing diversity? Are indie games a movement for more democratic games, or do they speak only to a small audience of connoisseurs?

I describe all of this as a continued quest for authenticity – a quest to distance indie games from big publishers, from traditional game form, and from the lack of diversity in big-budget and casual games.

Page previewThis is a trade book for a broad audience, but with theoretical underpinnings. It shows many strange new games in detail, it contains stories from my own participation in game jams and conferences, it is lavishly illustrated with more than 100 color pictures, and it features interviews with 21 developers and festival organizers (Jonathan Blow, Anna Anthropy, Bennett Foddy, Simon Carless, Nathalie Lawhead, and more).

The book took a lot of work, but it was also fun to write, as it gave me the chance to play hundreds of fascinating games, and to connect with interesting people in the independent game community. I hope you will enjoy it too.

Upcoming talks
I will be presenting the book at the NYU Game Center on October 10th, and at IndieCade in Los Angeles on October 12th.

Get the book
Handmade Pixels is available from (preferably?) your local independent bookstore, MIT Press, or any number of online retailers.
Official MIT Press site: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/handmade-pixels
My own book site, with the full developer interviews. https://www.jesperjuul.net/handmadepixels/