A Student/Worker’s Guide to European Google Docs / Office 365 Alternatives

What is it like to study or work professionally in 2025? Doesn’t it always involve the same setup?

You work from project to project in shifting groups. Each group shares a folder with Word documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and a host of other files. Multiple people can edit the same file at the same time. Most of the time you do this in your browser, but often you want to look up or edit something on your phone.

The Problem

For this kind of work, the world has gravitated towards Google Docs/Workspaces and Microsoft 365. But as of May 2025, this feels unsustainable. Let me state the obvious reasons:

  • As the saying goes, “If it is free then you are the product”. It is a bad thing to work in tools that track and analyze you and then sell the data or use it to sell ads to you. We should demand basic privacy from our tools.
  • The tech giants have too much power, and we should give them less.
  • Yes: Google and Microsoft are US companies, so all your emails and documents on their services are immediately available to a slew of agencies who can scan them for keywords, and your access is not guaranteed. As privacy activist Max Schrems will tell you, local law like the European GDPR does not protect your data from US companies.

How can we work around this?

Requirements for a Google Docs/Microsoft 365 Alternative

I wrote this guide because I couldn’t find one and had to test a number of solutions for myself. I think good guides are absent because of confusion about what the requirements are. Discussions of Google Docs alternatives tend to cover mostly the nearly irrelevant (email services with notetaking) or the technically onerous (“next, set up the reverse proxy”). That’s not it. To do our project work, this is what we require:

  1. Editing of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files in the browser.
  2. Sharing documents and folders with simultaneous editing.
  3. A service that you can sign up for easily.
  4. Free and paid tiers with transparent pricing.
  5. Generous storage for large projects.
  6. Placement in a European GDPR-covered setting (no US or US-owned companies, sorry).
  7. Preferred: No ads or tracking. (We should be willing to pay for our tools.)
  8. Preferred: App for editing on the fly.
  9. Preferred: Network drive (like Google Drive / Dropbox).
  10. Optional: Zero-Knowledge encryption, meaning that the company cannot read your documents, even if they want to.
  11. Optional: Integration with email.

I have tested the relevant offerings that I am aware of, uploading Word, Excel, and PowerPoint documents, and trying out sharing features. As far as I can tell, these are the worthy European Docs/Office alternatives that fit the requirements. I am not receiving any payment for these recommendations, and I may update this list if things change.

Most Complete Package: kSuite

kSuite docsGood:
-Fully featured office suite and email
-Good sharing
-Network drive in pro tier
-Extras like video conferencing and a WeTransfer clone
-Best email import

-Mobile app for editing
-Europe-based AI option

Bad
-Can be rough around the edges; occasional messages in French, and network drive sometimes needed restarting
-No zero-knowledge encryption

Pricing:
Free tier: 20/15 GB.

My kSuite: €2/month for 1TB
kSuite Pro: €6.58/month for 3TB and network drive
kSuite Pro: €12.42/month for 6TB and network drive

kDrive app editing word document I think kSuite from Swiss Infomaniak is the most complete Docs/Office alternative. It has good Word/Excel/PowerPoint compatibility, emails, and sharing of folders/documents including no-login editing (which I use in teaching contexts), in addition to video conferencing and Slack-like channels.

Here, I have uploaded a moderately complex Word document from an article about the Commodore 64, which includes images and an Excel vector diagram. It works surprisingly well, but this is generally true for most of the services, as they basically use either Collabora Office or OnlyOffice (this one) as underlying tech.

Also consider the app editing the same document. kSuite is not as polished as Google Docs, but it is a serviceable and quite complete platform that you can run whole projects or organizations on.

Simple and Incomplete: Mailbox.org

Mailbox.org logo

Mailbox.org file editingGood:
-Office suite and email with collaboration functionality
-Video conferencing 
-Basic Zero-knowledge encryption for selected files
-Includes email

Bad
-Office compatibility is incomplete
-Tiny storage allowances
-A little rough, sometimes switches to German
-No free tier means all collaborators must be on paid plans
-App does not allow editing

Pricing:
Standard: €3/month for 10/5 GB.

Premium: €9/month for 50GB.

Mailbox.org is the unfancy package that isn’t quite there. It features basic video meeting facilities, calendar, and tasks, and there is a Zero-Knowledge encryption facility for encrypting individual files with an extra password. But for practical work, the lack of a free tier means that all collaborators must be on a paid plan, the storage space is quite small, and the app does not allow editing. Also, as the image shows, the editor cannot show complicated word diagrams. Mailbox has been around for a while, but it is not quite there.

Cleanest Office Package, but with Trackers: Drime

Drime_logo

Drime file managerGood:
-Office suite with clean & modern design
-Nice group-oriented features
-Generous storage
-PDF and video editing

Bad:
-Lots of trackers on both website and app
-App only allows previews, no editing
-No email service
-Promised network drive not there yet
-No Zero-knowledge encryption

Pricing:
Free tier: 20 GB.
Starter: €2.99/month for 500GB
Essentials: €5.5/month for 2TB
Essentials: €10.99/month for 3TB
Advanced: €19.99/month for 6TB
(Plans allow multiple users.)

Drime is a new service with a clean and modern look, as well as good onboarding and well-designed groupware features. If you want an easy-to-use office package without email, this is a good bet. Office compatibility is identical to kSuite because it uses the same underlying software (OnlyOffice), but the general design is a bit more polished.

My main reservations are first that Drime collects lots of data on both app and website, (for all solutions tested I am going by the official declaration on Google Play, as well as by reporting from DuckDuckGo and Privacy Badger), and second that the app only allows browsing, not editing. If you can live with those caveats, Drime is a good option.

Most Secure: CryptPad

CryptPad word editorGood:
-Office suite with clean, modern design
-Also diagrams, Kanban (like Trello), and whiteboard

-Zero-knowledge encryption
-Good sharing options

Bad
-No email service
-No app and no network drive
-Small storage plans, so this is just for your documents
-Two-step upload procedure

Pricing:
Free tier: 1GB

Duo: €10/month for 25GB
Team: €15/month for 75GB
(Duo and Team and have multiple users.)

If you are sufficiently worried about privacy, CryptPad is the package to get. This is a nicely designed browser-only package with Zero-knowledge encryption. To explain: the company’s server stores your files in encrypted form without the key to decrypting it, so in theory the company cannot share your files even if subpoenaed. I am assuming that your interest in this feature comes from a good place.

CryptPad Office compatibility is good (again, this is OnlyOffice under the hood), and sharing options are quite sophisticated, including time-limited sharing. There are also interesting options for shared whiteboards and Kanban (Trello-like), so this is a quite complete package for collaboration.

Bonus: Email services

Though we are used to it, we don’t have to get our office and emails from the same provider, and for the email-less packages, a separate email provider is necessary anyway. Most privacy-conscious users swear by Swiss Proton which also features a Drive and VPN, or German Tuta. Both are zero-knowledge encrypted for maximum privacy. Encryption comes with the tradeoff that search is slow and poor because the server cannot search through your encrypted mails.

Furthermore, email import in Proton and Tuta is shaky, not for technical reasons, it just is. Proton can import large email archives, but they decided that multi-level Gmail labels were not important, so a well-organized Gmail archive will end up jumbled (nested labels are not rocket science, people). Tuta’s email import also does not work well with Gmail labels and struggles with large archives. kSuite’s import was much better in this regard.

Recommendations

There it is. A complete package, some office-only packages, some very polished, some a little rough. One with many trackers, some with encryption. Some writers will notice that all the screenshots show the whitespace between pages, but you cannot hide it in any of the packages! This drives me a little crazy, having participated in the decade-long struggle to get this feature into OpenOffice.

The packages are much better than I had hoped, but there are obvious opportunities: What if kSuite added encryption for selected folders? What if Drime got rid of the trackers and added encryption? What if there was an encrypted mail service that properly imported Gmail? What if someone properly packaged Nextcloud office for end-users? For now, I believe there are three main options, depending on your needs:

  • The complete package: kSuite, which includes email and collaboration.
  • The polished office suite without email, but with trackers: Drime.
  • The encrypted and truly privacy-conscious combination: CryptPad + Proton.

It is an individual choice whether to stick with the big tech platforms. Also consider how you feel about tracking, encryption, and convenience. I just hope to have contributed to making the choice easier. Over to you.

 

PS. If there is interest, I may publish a how-to-guide about practically moving your documents away from Google/Microsoft.

PPS. I excluded some services from the survey: Zoho Office (not based in Europe), Nextcloud Office, OnlyOffice, and Collabora Online (these are platforms, but not oriented towards end-users), Nuclino and Cryptee (cool, but not based on office formats). Proton Docs (more like WordPad than an office suite). Nextcloud servers are often brought up, but having tested the more polished offerings (Hosting.de, Nextcloud One, and Ionos), it is clear that they require too many complex steps for most people – the technology is there, it just needs to be packaged better – upfront pricing and feature info, English-language options, one-step install.

Open call for PhD projects

At the Royal Danish Academy we have an open call for PhD projects, and yes, it could be game and design-related.

The Royal Danish Academy hereby invites pre-qualification proposals for the 2025 call “PhD education outside the universities” (DFF – The Danish Independent Research Fund).

The 2025-call will be announced by DFF in June. We expect to be allowed to support up to three proposals. Only proposals for academic research within architecture, design or conservation will be taken into consideration.

The deadline for pre-qualification applications is May 15 2025 at noon.

Selected applicants are expected to engage in collaboration with a supervisor and the administration of the Royal Danish Academy when preparing the full proposal for DFF.

There is an online information session on April 22nd. Read more here: https://candidate.hr-manager.net/ApplicationInit.aspx/?cid=5001&departmentId=7810&ProjectId=187913

 

Interviewed in The American Journal of Play

The American Journal of Play has kindly interviewed me for their latest issue.

If you are interested in my thoughts on the field, and in me summarizing my own history, this is a great piece.

It is an honor but also disorienting to have reached the advanced stage of looking back on my career. Didn’t I just start (checks watch)?

Here is the direct link to the interview.

The Well-Read Game: On Playing Thoughtfully by Matthew Farber and Tracy Fullerton

The Well-read game book coverI am happy to welcome Matthew Farber and Tracy Fullerton’s wonderful new book The Well-Read Game: On Playing Thoughtfully to the Playful Thinking series!

How players evoke personal and subjective meanings through a new theory of player response.

In The Well-Read Game, Tracy Fullerton and Matthew Farber explore the experiences we have when we play games: not the outcomes of play or the aesthetics of formal game structures but the ephemeral and emotional experiences of being in play. These are the private stories we tell ourselves as we play, the questions we ask, and our reactions to the game’s intent. These experiences are called “readings” because they involve so many of the aspects of engaging with literary, cinematic, and other expressive texts. A game that is experienced in such a way can be called “well-read,” rather than, or as well as, “well-played,” because of the personal, interpretive nature of that experience and the way in which it relates to our reading of texts of all kinds.

The concept of the “well-read game” exists at the convergence of literary, media, and play theories—specifically, the works of Louise Rosenblatt’s reader-response theory, Brian Upton’s situational game theory, Tracy Fullerton’s playcentric design theory, and Bernie DeKoven’s well-played game philosophy. Each of these theories, from their own perspective, challenges notions of a separate, objective, or authorial meaning in a text and underscores the richness that arises from the varied responses of readers, who coauthor the meaning of each text through their active engagement with it. When taken together, these theories point to a richer understanding of what a game is and how we might better value our experiences with games to become more thoughtful readers of their essential meanings.

A History of the Commodore 64 in Twelve Objects #12: The Commodordion – two C64s = one accordion

On the occasion of my new book Too Much Fun: The Five Lives of the Commodore 64 Computer, I am writing A History of the Commodore 64 in Twelve Objects, posted weekly from November 1st, 2024.

The Commodordion

Linus Åkesson’s Commodordion

The final object: In the very first post of this “History of the Commodore 64 in Twelve Objects” series, I talked about the Commodore 64 itself – the iconic beige machine. Since then, I have explored ten other objects, from games and floppy disks to cartridges, BASIC programming, music, magazines, and even a paper invitation to a demo party.

It is now 43 years since the Commodore 64 was introduced at the 1982 Consumer Electronics Show. Amazingly, it went on sale the same year as the first CD player.

The C64 is now a historical device, but its story isn’t over. Users and developers are still finding new uses for it. When I started writing Too Much Fun in 2022, the charts for best demos and best games on CSDb and Lemon64 were dominated by old releases. Today, most top spots belong to new creations. There is a real resurgence of activity on the Commodore 64.

There also is a culture of Commodore 64 hardware experimentation. For my final object, I choose Swedish hardware hacker and musician Linus Åkesson’s 2022 Commodordion. It is a charming, musical, technically impressive, and obviously absurd project, making an accordion by combining two C64s connected by a bellows constructed from floppy disks.

Åkesson’s work exemplifies the continued fascination with the C64. It is about discovering new tricks and properties of the C64, Amiga, and other hardware, it is about programming expansive and minimal demos, making new hardware. Here the hardware is sometimes musical instruments used for musical performances.

Of course, the C64’s resurgence is also fueled by the availability of high-quality emulators. As I discuss in Too Much Fun, you can now experience the C64 without needing the original hardware. But this easy access makes projects like the Commodordion even more appealing, a way to connect with the physicality of the machine and experience it in a completely new way.

What song is the Commodordion playing? Ragtime tune Maple Leaf Rag by Scott Joplin, which has its own C64 history as music for excruciatingly difficult game China Miner.

The Commodordion symbolizes how exploring the Commodore 64 today is not just nostalgia. The C64 makes us think about forgotten pasts, re-evaluating our current relationship to technology, and blending ideas from different eras to create something entirely new.

Thank you for reading
Jesper Juul
Copenhagen, January 2025

A History of the Commodore 64 in Twelve Objects #11: Turrican II – keeping up with the Amiga

On the occasion of my new book Too Much Fun: The Five Lives of the Commodore 64 Computer, I am writing The History of the Commodore 64 in Twelve Objects, posted weekly from November 1st, 2024:

The final boss in Turrican II for the Commodore Amiga (source)

By 1991, the Commodore 64 was waning as a commercial platform – yet games were still coming out, especially in Europe. There had been little reason to expect that the C64 would be produced for so many years, and Commodore had assumed that the Commodore Amiga would be the replacement.

Launched as a professional computer in 1985 (Amiga 1000) and later as a consumer model in 1987 (Amiga 500), the Amiga was technologically in a completely different league. Designed by Jay Miner and the team behind Atari’s 8-bit computers, the Amiga had a faster CPU, digitized sound, a graphical multitasking OS, and a graphics system geared towards hires, multilayered and fast-moving graphics.

Where the original 1990 Turrican was a C64-first release, Turrican II was released in 1991 for the Amiga and later for the C64, PC, and other platforms. According to interviews with developer Manfred Trenz, Turrican II development started on the C64, but this platform apparently was no longer the primary focus. In this way, the space between Turrican I and II is the moment where the C64 became the secondary platform for the developer. The Turrican games also mark the time where the C64 action-adventure tradition discussed previously became influenced by Japanese action games too.

How would the C64 version stack up to other platforms? As the Zzap!64 review stated, “This game is the sort of program you’d expect … on some exotic, super expensive Japanese console. … The walkers are terrific too, they look like Amiga characters”. While the hardware of competing platforms was improving, C64 developers were also improving their skills, sometimes with inspiration from the demoscene.

The final boss in Turrican II for the Commodore 64 (source)

Developers were trying to keep up with more capable platforms, especially with the Amiga. In C64 reviews, the recurring question in the late 1980s and early 1990s became, “how good is it, compared to the Amiga version?” – or to a newer computer or console? This was raised for games (Defender of the CrownLemmings), user interfaces (the graphical GEOS interface), and demos.

In Too Much Fun, I call this the Fourth Life of the C64, characterized by anxiety about the status of the machine. But that anxiety was to dissipate, as I will discuss next week.

Did you worry that the C64 could no longer keep up with newer machines? When did you stop worrying?

Coming Jan 17th: Object #12 – The Commodordion – two C64s as a musical instrument